Advantage Title Blog

The Who, What, Where, Why and How about Title Insurance

FHA tightens rules, penalties for mortgage lenders

leave a comment »

by JON PRIOR

www.housingwire.com

Friday, January 20th, 2012, 9:00 am

The Federal Housing Administration will toughen its standards for approving lenders that insure mortgages on its behalf and force more of them to buyback defaulted loans.

FHA Commissioner Carol Galante said the upcoming rule changes will help the agency protect its Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, which, according to some, is in danger of needing a bailout. The fund slipped to a 0.24% capital ratio in the fiscal year 2011, down from 0.5% the year before.

The rule was initially proposed in October 2010 andfinalized Friday.

The rule changes apply to lenders authorized to insure mortgages for the FHA without first submitting documents to the agency. Roughly 80% of all FHA-insured mortgages are done this way.

The FHA will make it tougher to get approval for the coveted status. According to the new rule, a lender must hold a serious delinquency rate at or below 150% of the program’s average for the two years prior to its application. This rate will apply to all states in which the lender does business.

Also, the final rule forces lenders to indemnify – or reimburse FHA for an insurance claim – if the lender “knew or should have known” of any fraud or misrepresentation involved. Lenders would be on the hook for indemnification if the loan defaults within five years of origination.

Some commentary from the industry asked it to be shorted to a two or three year window, because problems that occur after then are due to job loss or divorce rather than decisions made at origination. FHA wouldn’t budge and said adopting the shorter timeframe “would be inconsistent with proper risk management practices.”

Others wanted clarification on whether or not the FHA would judge nationwide lenders with others operating within a smaller geographic area when determining approval or renewal of the status. They recommended larger lenders be held to a claim rate up to 150% of the national average, rather than just the states in does business in.

FHA didn’t amend the rule based on these comments either.

In a separate proposal, the FHA is changing the maximum allowable amount of seller concessions, or how much the seller contributes to the down payment or closing costs. The FHA said it will be reduced because the current level creates incentives to inflate the appraised value of the home.

Galante said the FHA will “continue to strike a balance” between managing its risk and continuing to provide support to a still struggling housing market.

“Taken together, the changes announced today will protect FHA’s insurance fund from unnecessary and inappropriate risks while offering clear guidance to lenders regarding HUD’s underwriting expectations,” Galante said.

Written by advantagetitle

January 23, 2012 at 10:40 AM

Posted in News

Existing home sales rise 5% in December

leave a comment »

by JUSTIN T. HILLEY

www.housingwire.com

Friday, January 20th, 2012, 9:32 am

Sales of existing homes rose for the third straight month, increasing 5% in December, according to the National Association of Realtors.

The trade group said the sale of single-family homes, townhomes, condos and co-ops increased to a seasonally adjusted rate of 4.61 million in December from a downwardly revised 4.39 million in November.

For all of 2011, existing-home sales rose 1.7% to 4.26 million from 4.19 million in 2010.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said these are early signs of what may be a sustained recovery.

“The pattern of home sales in recent months demonstrates a market in recovery,” he said. “Record low mortgage interest rates, job growth and bargain home prices are giving more consumers the confidence they need to enter the market.”

The national median existing-home price for all housing types fell 2.5% to $164,500 in December from the same month a year earlier. Distressed homes accounted for 32% of sales in December (19% were foreclosures and 13% were short sales), down from 36% in December 2010, but up from 29% in November.

Potential homeowners also have access to the lowest mortgage interest rates in 40 years. The national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage fell to another record low of 3.96% in December from 3.99% in November, according to Freddie Mac. The rate was 4.71% in December 2010.

Total housing inventory in December dropped 9.2% to 2.38 million existing homes available for sale, representing a 6.2-month supply at the current sales pace, down from a 7.2-month supply in November. Available inventory trended down since setting a record of 4.04 million in July 2007 and is at the lowest level since March 2005 when 2.30 million homes sat on the market.

NAR President Moe Veissi said more buyers are expected to take advantage of market conditions this year.

“We have a large pent-up demand, and household formation is likely to return to normal as the job market steadily improves,” he said. “More buyers coming into the market mean additional benefits for the overall economy. When people buy homes, they stimulate a lot of related goods and services.”

Written by advantagetitle

January 23, 2012 at 10:38 AM

Posted in News

Investors buying with cash pressure home prices

leave a comment »

by KERRI PANCHUK www.HousingWire.com

Monday, January 23rd, 2012, 7:51 am

Investors are gobbling up residential real estate with cash, pushing national home prices lower, according to the latestCampbell/Inside Mortgage Finance HousingPulse Tracking Survey.

The overall proportion of cash buyers in the housing market soared to a record 33.2%, compared to 29.6% a year earlier.

Meanwhile, the investor class relied heavily on cash to buy homes, with 74% of investors using cash to buy homes in December.

Investors represented 22.8% of home purchases in December alone, up slightly from 22.2% a month earlier.

The study says investor bids are bringing prices lower by waiting for other buyers to lose bids through the extensive mortgage approval process. The study says investors are nabbing properties at lower prices when other buyers lose bids during the extensive mortgage approval process or appraisals.

Real estate agents that responded to the survey said investors usually offer 10% to 20% below the listing price up to a price of $250,000.

Written by advantagetitle

January 23, 2012 at 10:37 AM

Posted in News

Fannie Mae sees 2012 home sales up 3.5% to 4.74 million

leave a comment »

by ANDREW SCOGGIN www.housingwire.com

Friday, January 13th, 2012

The housing sector will likely take incremental steps forward in 2012, though total originations will fall on fewer refinances, according to economists at Fannie Mae.

The second half of the year should outpace the first six months in terms of growth, though fiscal policy and political uncertainty in Washington will likely drive consumer and business activity, the mortgage giant said.

Chief Economist Doug Duncan said positive consumer activity and challenges in housing and the global economy will equate to moderate growth for the year.

“We’re entering 2012 with decent momentum, especially on the employment side, which is fostering positive household and consumer behavior,” Duncan said in a release. “Unfortunately, we expect this momentum to slow as we move through the first half of the year.”

The report released Friday forecast total home sales to increase 3.5% to about 4.74 million in 2012 from 2011 with another 5% gain in 2013 to nearly 5 million. New home sales could jump 10.4% for 2012.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency home sales price index, excluding refinances, could dip 1.1% for 2012 from a year before, according to the forecast. Economists predicted the 2011 index would finish 4.6% lower than 2010.

Mortgage originations as dollar volume could see a decline as well in 2012, largely on a steep drop in refinances. The Fannie report said total originations will fall to $1.01 trillion in 2012 from a predicted final 2011 tally of $1.36 trillion. Economists expected refinancing to plummet to $540 billion from $894 billion.

Purchase mortgages, however, will rise to $471 billion in 2012 from a estimated 2011 total of $464, according to the report.

Total single-family outstanding mortgage debt will likely drop 1.3% to $10.14 trillion in 2012.

For the U.S. economy as a whole, Fannie researchers predicted real GDP would increase 3.3% in the fourth quarter to finish the year at 1.7% growth. Economists forecast 2.3% GDP growth for 2012 and 2013.

Written by advantagetitle

January 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM

Posted in News

Foreclosures fall to lowest level since 2007

leave a comment »

By Les Christie @CNNMoney January 12, 2012

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Foreclosure filings and repossessions fell to their lowest level since 2007 last year.

Total filings, including default notices and bank repossessions were down 33% for the year to 2.7 million, according to RealtyTrac, the online marketer of foreclosed properties.

One in every 69 homes had at least one foreclosure filing during the year, while 804,000 homes were repossessed. That’s a significant improvement from the peaks reached in 2010 — when 1.05 million homes were repossessed — and the lowest levels seen since 2007.

More than 4 million homes have been lost to foreclosure over the past five years.

While the declines seem like good news for the housing market, where a flood of foreclosed homes has depressed home prices, much of it is due to processing delays caused by fall-out from the “robo-signing” scandal that broke in late 2010.

During the year, banks spent more time making sure paperwork was legal and proper, creating a backlog in the foreclosure pipeline. As a result, the average time it took to process a foreclosure climbed to 348 days during the fourth quarter, up from 305 days a year earlier.

“Foreclosures were in full delay mode in 2011, resulting in a dramatic drop in foreclosure activity for the year,” said Brandon Moore, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac.

However, Moore said there were “strong signs” during the second half of the year that lenders are working through foreclosure backlogs in certain markets. He expects foreclosure activity to rise above 2011′s level but remain below the peak hit in 2010.

Low rates offer some help for homeowners

Early in 2011, many forecasters were predicting a wave of foreclosures due to resetting adjustable-rate mortgages, but low mortgage rates helped many borrowers refinance into more affordable loans, said Moore.

The government helped as well, through efforts like the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), which made refinancing easier for borrowers who owe more on their mortgage than their homes are worth.

Government foreclosure prevention programs, including HARP and the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), have started about 5.5 million mortgage modifications since April 2009, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

“Programs like HAMP and HARP have definitely made a dent in the foreclosure problem,” said Moore “However, they are certainly not living up to their billing of preventing several million foreclosures. In addition, many [HAMP] homeowners fall back into foreclosure later on.”

Of course, there were still plenty of factors working against homeowners in 2011, including the continued erosion in home prices. Falling prices rob homeowners of home equity, which they can tap if they need emergency cash.

Foreclosure hot spots

Hot spots for foreclosures remain mostly in “bubble states,” where speculative investors helped drive up home prices beyond their fundamental values during the mid-2000s housing boom.

Nevada, where one out of every 16 households received some kind of default notice during the year, was the worst hit of all, a distinction it has held for the fifth consecutive year.

Arizona had the second highest foreclosure rate and California came in third. Florida, which had been running neck-and-neck with the other “Sand States” in past years, fell to seventh, behind Georgia, Utah and Michigan.

Among metro areas, Las Vegas suffered from the highest foreclosure rate in 2011. California put seven cities in the top 10, led by Stockton in the second slot. Other cities in the top 10 included Phoenix, which finished sixth, and Reno, Nev. was eighth. To top of page

Written by advantagetitle

January 16, 2012 at 12:58 PM

Posted in News

Freddie extends mortgage forbearance for unemployed

leave a comment »

www.housingwire.com

by JACOB GAFFNEY

Friday, January 6th, 2012

Mortgage finance firm Freddie Mac will give unemployed borrowers a break on their mortgage for up to one year.

“These expanded forbearance periods will provide families facing prolonged periods of unemployment with a greater measure of security by giving them more time to find new employment and resolve their delinquencies,” said Tracy Mooney, senior vice president of single-family servicing and REO at Freddie Mac.

“We believe this will put more families back on track to successful long-term homeownership,” Mooney adds.

Freddie said the new deal expands the powers of mortgage servicers. The edict gives servicers the ability to forebear a mortgage for six months without prior approval from Freddie. Freddie Mac can approve an additional six months after that.

Previously, Freddie Mac allowed servicers to grant up to three months of forbearance with no payment, or six months at a reduced payment, without prior approval.
The new options go into effect on Feb. 1.

Longer forbearance times used to be restricted to events such as natural disasters, permanent disability or long-term medical emergencies — and required prior approval.

William Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, called for principal forgiveness from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, something both GSEs say is not worth doing.

Written by advantagetitle

January 9, 2012 at 10:47 AM

Posted in News

FHA says: Flip that house

leave a comment »

By Les Christie @CNNMoney January 2, 2012

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Flippers, the real estate investors who buy homes on the cheap and quickly resell them at a profit, just got a reprieve from the Federal Housing Administration.

In an effort to help stabilize housing prices and unload some of the foreclosures that are flooding low-income communities, the mortgage insurer extended a waiver of its anti-flipping regulations through 2012.

The waiver, which was initially issued in 2010 and set to expire this month, suspends regulations that prohibit the agency from insuring mortgages used to purchase homes that are bought and resold in less than 90 days.

“This extension is intended to accelerate the resale of foreclosed properties in neighborhoods struggling to overcome the possible effects of abandonment and blight,” said Acting Federal Housing Administration Commissioner Carol Galante.

Low-income neighborhoods are particularly plagued by foreclosed homes that lower property values and act as magnets for crime and other social ills. Real estate flippers often rehab these damaged homes before reselling them, improving conditions for neighborhoods.

The FHA, which does not issue mortgages but insures them, is a primary player when it comes to mortgage lending in low-income communities. Many loans in these communities could not be issued without FHA backing.

The ban against flipping was initially put in place to prevent predatory flipping, in which homes are quickly resold at inflated prices to unsuspecting borrowers.

In order to qualify for the waiver, certain conditions must be met. The transaction must be “arms length” with no other relationship between seller and buyer.

In addition, if the new sale price is 20% or more above the previous selling price, the lender has to document and justify the increase and meet other conditions, such as making sure the home has been inspected.

Since the waiver went into effect in February of 2010, the FHA has insured more than 42,000 loans to purchase homes that were being resold within 90 days. These totaled more than $7 billion in mortgage principal.

Written by advantagetitle

January 9, 2012 at 10:45 AM

Posted in News

Bridging the great divide between home buyers and sellers

leave a comment »

With mortgage rates below 4% and prices near bottom in many

markets, it’s a good time to buy a house. But many owners won’t

sell because they can’t get the price they want.

January 01, 2012|By Kenneth R. Harney, LA Times

Reporting from Washington — Where do you side in the great real estate buy-sell divide of 2012? If you’re a homeowner considering selling sometime in the new year, are you apprehensive that you won’t get the price you need or want, and therefore it’s possible you won’t even try to sell?

If you’re a buyer, do you agree that with 30-year fixed mortgage rates now below 4% and home prices near cyclical bottom in many areas, 2012 offers extraordinary opportunities, even if listings are fewer than you might prefer?

A new study by the Research Institute for Housing America, the think tank affiliate of the Mortgage Bankers Assn., documents a profound market fissure caused by owners’ fears and hesitation — what researchers call “negative selling sentiment.”

Nearly 80% of consumers in the study’s survey think this is a great time to buy a house, but more than 92% of homeowners think it’s not a great time to sell.

The study was conducted by Syracuse University economist Gary Engelhardt using extensive data from the University of Michigan’s Survey Research Center, which is generally recognized as an authoritative source on consumer attitudes.

Engelhardt said that compared with earlier post-recession periods, owners have been more deeply shocked by the extent and severe side effects of foreclosures, short sales and unemployment. In the aftermath of earlier recessions, such as in the early 1990s, 40% to 60% of homeowners remained relatively positive about their prospects if they chose to sell — far higher than the tiny sliver who see it that way today.

Many owners “have not adjusted their price expectations downward” to keep pace with local declines in property values after the mortgage bust, Engelhardt said, thereby contributing to the sharp divergence in their real estate visions compared with those of buyers.

This is consistent with the results of a study conducted in mid-2011 by Zillow, the online real estate and mortgage information company.

Zillow found that sellers nationwide were having trouble coming to grips with what market forces had done to their property values. They knew prices had declined, but they didn’t necessarily think those devaluations applied to their houses.

For example, people who had purchased their homes in 2007 or later thought their homes were worth about 14% more than their actual sales value. People who bought homes before 2002 were slightly more realistic, but still overvalued their houses by about 12%.

How are such seller perceptions affecting local real estate market dynamics today? For one thing, they are keeping owners out of the game. But they also are bringing more motivated and committed sellers to the fore. Glenn Kelman, chief executive of Redfin, a national realty brokerage in Seattle, said the shortages of listings in some markets are the product of owners “waiting for better times to sell.”

But owners who believe they need to sell now — they’re downsizing, moving to a new area or getting divorced — turn out to be “more reasonable” in general, Kelman said. “Some are even resigned” to the reality that despite their unfortunate timing, they will definitely sell provided that they price the house realistically.

David Howell, executive vice president of McEnearney Associates, a large realty firm active in the Washington, D.C., area, said the absence of substantial numbers of people who would otherwise be sellers may also be a healthy development.

With listing inventories lower than typical for this time of the year, there are fewer houses for buyers to choose from. This, in turn, exerts a slight upward pressure on prices.

What about sellers who refuse to believe their properties won’t command the prices they expect or require? Mike Litzner, broker-owner of Century 21 American Homes on New York’s Long Island, said, “It’s all about educating them. We try to show them the comparables” — the recent selling prices of similar houses in the area. “If sellers really want to sell,” he said, “they adjust their expectations to the changed realities.”

If they adamantly refuse, Litzner said, his agents often decline the listing rather than waste weeks or months trying to market an overpriced piece of real estate.

Howell said his firm’s agents sometimes walk away from unreasonable listing price demands, but they also use a technique that seeks to bridge the seller-buyer divide: pre-authorized price reduction clauses in the listing contract that ratchet down the asking number. The initial reduction kicks in within the first two to three weeks if the house fails to attract buyer interest.

“It works,” Howell said. “And both sides stand to benefit.”

Written by advantagetitle

January 3, 2012 at 10:15 AM

Posted in News

Payroll tax cut may hurt housing market

leave a comment »

To pay for the two-month payroll tax cut, a small fee will be levied for a decade on all mortgages sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That also makes it harder to overhaul the housing finance system.

  • A sale pending sign sits outside a home in San Rafael, Calif. The new mortgage fee may make loans unaffordable for some people, but the effect probably would be modest, banking analyst Bert Ely said.
A sale pending sign sits outside a home in San Rafael, Calif. The new mortgage… (Justin Sullivan, Getty Images)
December 23, 2011|By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Washington — The new mortgage fee to fund the temporary extension of the payroll tax cut could damp the still-sluggish real estate market and complicate efforts to overhaul the nation’s wounded housing finance system.

Even though the tax cut approved Friday extends for only two months, a small fee on loan amounts will be levied for a decade on all mortgages sold to housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which control about 60% of the nation’s mortgage market.

That fee arrangement also makes it difficult for Congress to work on efforts to shut down Fannie and Freddie, which federal regulators seized three years ago with a taxpayer bailout now estimated to total about $150 billion.

Based on prevailing rates for a 30-year fixed-rate loan, a homeowner borrowing $200,000 would pay about $4,000 more if the loan were sold to Fannie or Freddie. That would raise the mortgage payment about $11 a month for the life of the loan.

“Housing doesn’t need any more speed bumps, and this is a speed bump,” said Jaret Seiberg, senior financial policy analyst at Guggenheim Partners in Washington. “It’s not a big one, but every extra penny that it costs to finance a home puts that much more downward pressure on home prices.”

The collapse of the housing market triggered the Great Recession and led to a wave of foreclosures as housing prices plummeted nationally. The market has been struggling to recover amid weak economic growth and high unemployment.

The fee may make a new loan unaffordable for some people, but the effect probably would be modest, said banking analyst Bert Ely of Alexandria, Va. The bigger effect will be on the government’s ability to overhaul the housing finance system, which most analysts said is needed.

“This really complicates what you do with Fannie and Freddie down the road,” Ely said.

The Obama administration and some analysts have called for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to raise their fees to make it easier for private companies to compete with them. Because Fannie and Freddie are owned by the government, investors view the mortgage-backed securities they create as safer investments than those offered by private firms.

David Stevens, president of the Mortgage Bankers Assn., said a fee increase would be fine — if the money were used to offset losses at Fannie and Freddie. But diverting the money to other government uses is a bad idea, he said.

“These institutions, which have been so costly to Americans and are so necessary to the housing recovery … should not be the piggy bank for future arbitrary tax policy,” Stevens said.

“We understand the desire by Congress to extend the payroll tax [cut] because so many Americans are hurting right now,” he said. “But the cost of that is going to be directly paid for by a whole other set of Americans who use Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for their mortgages.”

This month, the mortgage bankers group joined with the National Assn. of Home Builders and the National Assn. of Realtors in urging lawmakers not to use the fee to pay for the extension package.

Edward DeMarco, the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, also raised concerns.

He said the government reliance on long-term revenue from the firms seemed inconsistent with the need to end the conservatorship and overhaul the housing finance system.

The agency did not comment on the legislation, which President Obama quickly signed Friday.

The housing finance agency will announce soon when it will implement the fee, spokeswoman Corinne Russell said. The law allows the agency to phase in the fee over two years.

Congress and the White House agreed on the fee as a way to pay for the extensions without finding spending cuts or tax increases to offset the cost.

But some lawmakers criticized the money-raising move. Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Granite Bay) called it “atrocious public policy.”

“It shifts the burden for this bill to future home buyers, kicks the housing market when it’s already down, makes it that much more expensive for home buyers to reenter the market and adds to the pressures that have chronically depressed everyone’s home values,” he said.

Written by advantagetitle

December 27, 2011 at 11:55 AM

Posted in News

Consumer protection bureau opens mortgage complaint hotline

leave a comment »

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s new mortgage complaint service is an extension of the agency’s existing hotline for credit card-related disputes and inquiries.

By Kenneth R. Harney, LA TimesDecember 11, 2011

Reporting from Washington—

Got a beef with your mortgage lender? Is your bank unresponsive when you complain that your escrow account is fouled up and making your monthly payments needlessly high?

Did your loan officer switch you into a more costly home loan than you were promised? Or worse yet, did your home loan servicer ignore you when you told him you’ve had an unexpected drop in income and needed a modification to avoid missing payments?

If any of these situations sound familiar, here’s a heads-up about the newest and least-publicized source of federal help: the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s home mortgage complaint and dispute resolution hotline. Never heard of it? That’s not surprising since it went live only Dec. 1 and the bureau hasn’t said much about it, preferring to ease into the potential snake pit of mortgage issues that American consumers have with their lenders rather than get overwhelmed.

The complaint hotline is accessible online athttp://www.consumerfinance.gov and by toll-free phone between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern at (855) 411-2372.

The bureau was created by last year’s Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation and is supposed to look out for your interests in banking, financial products, home loans and all other forms of consumer credit. Its mortgage complaint service is an extension of the agency’s existing hotline for credit card-related disputes and inquiries, which began July 21.

So far, according to the bureau, the credit card hotline has handled 5,074 complaints. Of this total, 84% were referred directly to the card issuers — mainly big banks — for resolution. Some complaints came with incomplete information or were referred to other agencies for action. About 74% of the complaints were subsequently reported back from banks as resolved, and 71% of the resolutions were not disputed by the consumers who lodged the complaints. Just under 13% of credit card complainants reported that they were not satisfied with the card issuer’s actions.

The credit card complaint service is likely to provide a template for the consumer bureau’s approach to mortgage problems, which are expected to be more voluminous. When a borrower submits a formal complaint to the bureau, complete with account numbers and other key identifiers, the information will be sent immediately to the lender or mortgage servicer named in the complaint using a secure Web portal.

The lender must then review the information, contact the customer if needed and determine what action to take to resolve the matter. Next, the lender is supposed to report its action — if any — to the bureau, which sends it on to the borrower for review. Throughout the process, according to the bureau, borrowers can log onto the agency’s “secure ‘consumer portal’ or call the toll-free number to receive updates, provide additional information and review responses” from the lender.

If the dispute focuses on what is primarily a matter of state regulation or is beyond the purview of the bureau, the dispute may be referred to other agencies. Similarly, if the dispute points to fraud or identity theft, the bureau is likely to refer it to either a federal or a state law enforcement authority. For the time being, the bureau is referring all complaints involving small banks or their subsidiaries that have less than $10 billion in assets to other agencies.

In the mortgage field, however, the vast majority of loan originations and servicing are controlled by the top 10 largest banks or their subsidiaries, which means that a high percentage of the complaints received are likely to be handled by the bureau.

How is this going to work in practice? Though consumer groups are optimistic, and the bureau says it’s staffed and ready to go, some mortgage industry leaders worry that the agency could be taking on more than it can realistically handle and raising borrower expectations that can’t be met.

David H. Stevens, president and chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Assn., said that while he has found the bureau to be “fairly thoughtful” in its approach to lending and disclosure issues to date, he is “concerned that they are moving too quickly too soon.” If the bureau is not properly equipped to handle large volumes of emails and calls, the service could be “an investigatory black hole” where complaints are filed but not addressed quickly or adequately, and it could be “a net negative” for borrowers who have genuine problems, Stevens said.

Since the agency is expected to report on the initial months’ results sometime early in 2012, Stevens and consumers should have answers fairly soon. Meanwhile, if you’ve got a legitimate complaint, give the hotline a shot.

Written by advantagetitle

December 12, 2011 at 9:39 AM

Posted in News

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 289 other followers